Promote /tables, /excel-query, /query-tool, /mid-section-defect from deferred to full shell-governed in-scope routes with canonical redirects, content contracts, governance artifacts, and updated CI gates. Unify all page header gradients to #667eea → #764ba2 and h1 font-size to 24px for visual consistency across all dashboard pages. Remove Native Route-View dev annotations from job-query, excel-query, and query-tool headers. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
42 lines
2.6 KiB
Markdown
42 lines
2.6 KiB
Markdown
## MODIFIED Requirements
|
|
|
|
### Requirement: Deferred-route content modernization SHALL remain contract-first
|
|
Before deferred routes are cut over to modernized implementations, each route SHALL define filter/query/data-state contracts and critical interaction expectations.
|
|
|
|
#### Scenario: Deferred-route contract baseline defined
|
|
- **WHEN** `/tables`, `/excel-query`, `/query-tool`, or `/mid-section-defect` enters modernization
|
|
- **THEN** a route-level baseline SHALL capture filter input semantics, query payload shape, and critical state expectations
|
|
|
|
### Requirement: Deferred-route implementation SHALL require pre-change confirmation
|
|
Each deferred route SHALL complete a route-scoped pre-change confirmation before implementation begins.
|
|
|
|
#### Scenario: Route enters implementation queue
|
|
- **WHEN** a deferred route is selected for modernization implementation
|
|
- **THEN** a pre-change confirmation record SHALL exist before any route code changes proceed
|
|
- **THEN** the record SHALL include current route status snapshot, baseline contract references, known-bug baseline reference, and rollback flag plan
|
|
|
|
### Requirement: Deferred-route modernization scope SHALL NOT be limited to already-released routes
|
|
Deferred modernization scope SHALL follow the deferred route matrix, even if those routes are currently marked `dev`.
|
|
|
|
#### Scenario: Route status is dev in page registry
|
|
- **WHEN** `/tables`, `/excel-query`, `/query-tool`, or `/mid-section-defect` is currently `dev`
|
|
- **THEN** the route SHALL remain eligible for modernization in this follow-up change
|
|
- **THEN** already-`released` in-scope routes outside deferred scope SHALL not be reopened by this change unless explicitly required for shared governance wiring
|
|
|
|
### Requirement: Deferred-route cutover SHALL require parity + manual acceptance
|
|
Deferred routes SHALL NOT complete cutover without parity evidence and explicit manual sign-off.
|
|
|
|
#### Scenario: Parity and sign-off before route progression
|
|
- **WHEN** a deferred route reports implementation complete
|
|
- **THEN** golden fixture parity checks and interaction parity checks SHALL pass
|
|
- **THEN** manual acceptance checklist sign-off SHALL be recorded
|
|
- **THEN** next deferred route cutover SHALL be blocked until sign-off is complete
|
|
|
|
### Requirement: Legacy bug carry-over SHALL be blocked for deferred routes
|
|
Known legacy bugs in deferred-route migrated scope SHALL be replayed during acceptance and SHALL block sign-off if reproduced.
|
|
|
|
#### Scenario: Deferred-route bug replay gate
|
|
- **WHEN** deferred-route manual acceptance executes
|
|
- **THEN** known-bug replay checks SHALL run
|
|
- **THEN** reproduced known bugs SHALL fail route sign-off and block legacy retirement
|