7cb0985b12
Implement phased modernization infrastructure for transitioning from multi-page legacy routing to SPA portal-shell architecture, plus post-delivery hardening fixes for policy loading, fallback consistency, and governance drift detection. Key changes: - Add route contract enrichment with scope/visibility/compatibility policies - Canonical 302 redirects from legacy direct-entry to /portal-shell/ routes - Asset readiness enforcement and runtime fallback retirement for in-scope routes - Shared feature-flag helpers (env > config > default) replacing duplicated _to_bool - Defensive copy for lru_cached policy payloads preventing mutation corruption - Unified retired-fallback response helper across app and blueprint routes - Frontend/backend route-contract cross-validation in governance gates - Shell CSS token fallback values for routes rendered outside shell scope - Local-safe .env.example defaults with production recommendation comments - Legacy contract fallback warning logging and single-hop redirect optimization Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
1.7 KiB
1.7 KiB
MODIFIED Requirements
Requirement: Frontend styles SHALL be governed by Tailwind design tokens
The frontend SHALL enforce a token-governed style system for in-scope routes. Shared visual semantics SHALL be expressed through token-backed Tailwind/shared layers, and ad-hoc page-local hard-coded values for shared semantics SHALL require explicit exception governance.
Scenario: Shared token usage across in-scope modules
- WHEN two in-scope modules render equivalent UI semantics (e.g., card, filter chip, primary action, status indicator)
- THEN they SHALL use the same token-backed style semantics
- THEN visual output SHALL remain consistent across those modules
Scenario: Token governance review
- WHEN an in-scope route introduces new shared UI styling
- THEN the styling SHALL map to shared tokens/layers or be recorded in an approved exception registry
Requirement: Tailwind migration SHALL support coexistence with legacy CSS
Tailwind migration SHALL support controlled coexistence only as a transition state for this phase. In-scope routes SHALL move toward isolation-first style ownership and SHALL NOT introduce new page-global CSS side effects for route-local concerns.
Scenario: In-scope global selector control
- WHEN in-scope route styles are reviewed
- THEN new route-local styling SHALL NOT introduce page-global selectors (
:root,body) for local presentation behavior
Scenario: Deferred route coexistence allowance
- WHEN deferred routes (
/tables,/excel-query,/query-tool,/mid-section-defect) are evaluated during this phase - THEN existing coexistence posture SHALL be allowed and handled by a follow-up modernization change